I posted it on NAVER's Intellectual Property Department, but it hasn't been answered for weeks, so I'm asking this question.
I was wondering if anyone knew this place.
I'm looking for a website through Naver Syndication.
If you look at the results of the website search, you can find something different from what you submitted as a syndication document.
To explain more,
Syndication Contents Medium Registration/Modification Entry Indexes
<Content> or <Summary> and I think it is used as a snippet content in the search results.
The date is not accurate, but until early last month, it was well exposed according to the submitted syndication.
However, since the beginning of last month, some of the snippets have changed to different contents, and now most of the articles show different contents from the syndication.
From the snippet content, I think that Yeti, a Naver search robot, comes directly to the site address and searches for links or scratches the contents to index and show the contents instead of showing the submitted syndication's <content> or <summary>.As a result, it shows a lot of meaningless links on the page or content that is not directly related to the text (e.g., site menus, comments, recommendations, related posts, etc.). So when you search, you search for irrelevant text or meaningless content that is not related to the content of the snippet.
This may increase coverage, but the Revelance is so low that the problem is low Revelance in web search, and the effort to improve it is syndication, but I think it will be meaningless.
Looking up a little bit, it seems that Naver actually launched the Griffin project on December 7th.
Given the timing when the syndication content is not applied well, I think there was a bug in the logic while applying it at this point.
Regarding the internal implementation logic, it can't be confirmed unless it's the actual Naver developer, so I think the Naver developer should answer it himself.
Naver Customer Center has disappeared, and I'm not even an internal employee if I ask Naver intellectual, but I keep forcing them to ask Naver intellectualLOL
How did anyone contact Naver to solve it?
If you are exposed to snippets that are different from the contents submitted by the syndication, please let me know if you have solved them~
276 2018-01-18 Gentleman
It's a different story, but it feels like NAVER is becoming insincere
As the person who asked the question said, I think Naver should answer these questions directly, but considering that the users are telling them to solve them on their ownkk
When I look at the questions and answers of intellectuals, most of them are now so low in quality that they don't pay much
Rather, lifeqna and community question answers seem to be more active, and there are many more meaningful answers
I get a lot of information, even if it's not the answer
What's funny is that NAVER supports intellectuals or its own services
At the same time, web searches are continuing to decline.
(Syndication and Griffin projects are also saying that they are activating web search because they are goodten thousand
In fact, I think syndication is to push them into their servers to support web searches without using the server as much as Google
After applying the Griffin project, the pv of community sites decreased by 60-90%, and now Naver's inflow has decreased so much that it has decreased to 10~30% compared to before
I think the actual goal of the Griffin project is to continue to weaken other services other than Naver's own services.
They say they will raise the ranking of professional data, but they will push it because it cannot happen on Naver's own service.
The part of the community site that overlaps with NAVER is to use an intellectual cafe lol
I don't know exactly, but lifeqna probably has a lot of pv because it overlaps with intellectuals.)
I don't know your exact answer, but sometimes even intellectuals who think they're from the customer center write answers, but if there's no answer,
It could be a bug
I think he intentionally ignored syndication, crawled through meaningless data, indexed it, and then lowered the search ranking.
Of course, users will also see a lot of meaningless content after watching the snippets, so they won't click well, which will lower the ranking.
Naver's policy seems to be like that, so there seems to be no answer except for watching more.
I can really relate to that
In the past, the number of pvs has increased steadily
As soon as the snippet content began to change badly, the pv decreased to 10% compared to before in a day, and it didn't increase anymore
I was wondering how this happened, but it was frustrating because I couldn't ask Naver, but it was intentional
We'll have to look forward to the growth of Daum or Google as soon
Now that we have a monopoly, we have this problem
Looking at the comments above, I think Google is the answer to web search.
As time goes by, I don't use Naver often if I have something to search for, but I use Google to search for sites, but I think this is better.
There's a lot of information in the community, but Naver is trying to block it more. It's disgusting because I can see that you're trying to eat alone
NAVER is like a smart villain.
I hope you do well next time, but next time, I feel like a fool who doesn't know what to do.
Same Tag I want to know the phone number of NAVER's Center
Same Tag How do I get the results of Naver or the next web search?
Same Tag I got a text from Naver Cloud, what should I do?
Same Tag Is it possible to automatically back up Korean 2018 documents with Naver Cloud?
Same Tag Is the Naver ID creation standard based on the mobile phone number?
© 2013-2025 LifeQnA. All rights reserved.