How's SSHD Cost-Effective?
If you want to use SSD for 1TB large capacity, the cost is too high.
As you all know, regular hard drives are too slow.
So I'm looking for SSHD as a substitute.
What do you think about the cost performance if you actually used it?
407 2016-05-02 Gentleman
It depends on the purpose of use, but once you look at it, SSHD is an HDD plus about 8 gigabytes of NAND flash memory.
So if the file size is small, it's effective
As the file size grows, HDD performance is achieved when reading and writing more than 8 gigabytes per program operation.
In recent programs, the program has grown so much that it's not performing very well.
So it's ambiguous on cost-effectiveness.
I'd rather buy SSD and HDD separately, which I've been using a lot lately
Most programs are on SSD side
On the HDD side, it is more efficient to store large amounts of data such as videos.
SSHDs are hybrid products with low-capacity NAND flash on HDDs.
It is a form of writing a lot of reading and writing in a cache method that is processed by NAND flash.
So it doesn't come out as fast as SSD, which is just flash memory.
It's faster than a normal HDD
Without HDDs and SSHDs, SSHDs are definitely faster, so they look cost-effective.
In terms of structure, NAND flash cache is added, so it's hard to get cheaper
It could come cheap for quantity processing or something like that'
© 2013-2025 LifeQnA. All rights reserved.