Do you have defamation laws if you post a critical review or reply?

A. 1

I'm not sure about the other parts
The reason for blocking on Naver is that it can block posts at the request of the company mentioned (as far as I know, it is stipulated by law) and there is a grace period for one month (I roughly gave an example because I don't know the exact period).
During this period, the person who posted can present his/her objection to Naver to unblock it, and if he/she thinks the suggested opinion is reasonable, he/she will release it again.
There are cases where companies that promote this on blogs and cafes abuse it.
For example, if there is anything critical about their products, they ask Naver to block them.
According to the law, it is not possible to see the content for about a month because it is unconditionally blocked regardless of whether it is reasonable or contrary to laws such as the Defamation Act.
Most of the people who post are rarely afraid to raise objections because they think they have attempted something illegal when blocked.
And even if you raise a counterargument and publish it again, it's been about a month, so whether it's a blog or a cafe, you can't see the opinion because it's pushed far back.
It is often used by social workers in this way.

Gentleman 7 years ago 0

I'm not sure about the other parts
The reason for blocking on Naver is that it can block posts at the request of the company mentioned (as far as I know, it is stipulated by law) and there is a grace period for one month (I roughly gave an example because I don't know the exact period).
During this period, the person who posted can present his/her objection to Naver to unblock it, and if he/she thinks the suggested opinion is reasonable, he/she will release it again.
There are cases where companies that promote this on blogs and cafes abuse it.
For example, if there is anything critical about their products, they ask Naver to block them.
According to the law, it is not possible to see the content for about a month because it is unconditionally blocked regardless of whether it is reasonable or contrary to laws such as the Defamation Act.
Most of the people who post are rarely afraid to raise objections because they think they have attempted something illegal when blocked.
And even if you raise a counterargument and publish it again, it's been about a month, so whether it's a blog or a cafe, you can't see the opinion because it's pushed far back.
It is often used by social workers in this way.

A. 2

https://www.clien.net/service/board/kin/11154874?p...
I was really curious about this, so I looked it up and there were similar questions and answers
For more information, you can look at the comments above
Simply put, you can't talk about an individual who points to a specific person
However, government agencies, countries, corporations, products, and services are all not people, so you can argue or use them severely.
But you can't point to a specific person who belongs to a government agency, a state, or a corporation.

Gentleman 7 years ago 0

A. 3

@2 Thank you for the good information
In conclusion, I can write a review
You don't have to use initial consonants. You can mention the company or the product

Gentleman 7 years ago 0